Independent Energy Producers Protest 'Self-Serving' PG&E Proposal

PUC's decision on PG&E's 'Tesla' proposal will determine if California has vigorous competition, or a return to monopoly power.

 
[20-August-2008]
 

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Aug. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- The Independent Energy Producers Association (IEP) today filed a formal protest with the state's Public Utility Commission over PG&E's "self-serving" application for fast-track approval of its proposed Tesla Generating Station outside the competitive process.

According to the protest, PG&E's application shows a "flagrant disregard" for the commission's approval process and "confirms that PG&E is intent on re-monopolizing the generation sector of the electric industry."

"If ratepayers are to reap the benefits that competition can offer -- more efficient generation, technological innovation, improved reliability, lower costs, and transparency -- the Commission must forcefully reject PG&E's self-serving proposal," reads the protest.

"IEP suspects that PG&E's real motivation for proposing the Tesla project is to expand its ratebase," says the protest, noting that PG&E's economic motivations "should not be allowed to supersede the commission's 'competitive market first' policy, which is designed to bring long-term benefits to ratepayers."

The protest also disputes PG&E's claim that reliability would be threatened if the Tesla project had to go through the competitive process, and said PG&E's request that ratepayers be liable for "pre-approval" costs even if the plant is rejected "should be firmly rejected."

"Once again, PG&E is exploiting the Commission's commitment to reliability to force the Commission to... abandon the model of fair, open, transparent, and competitive procurement that it has repeatedly endorsed," asserts the protest. "There can be no fairness or competition if one 'competitor' is insured against risk by ratepayers while all others must bear the same risk alone."

IEP concludes its formal protest by saying the commission's decision "will determine whether the California energy market will evolve into a vigorous, open, and fair competitive market or revert to the vertically integrated monopoly model of the past."

SOURCE Independent Energy Producers Association

More Press Releases »

 

Just Posted Jobs

Guest Column: BY LLEWELLYN KING

COMMENTARY There is a joke of no known authorship which says, “No good deed shall go unpunished.” So, alas, it has been with nuclear power. The gift was given to the world by the storied Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, which wrote and promoted... More »